SliTak and Damn Small Linux

Using Virtualbox, I've started playing around with the two mini-distributions of Linux: SliTak and Damn Small Linux (and I'm looking forward to playing around with more). Overall I'm really impressed with these two distributions! Here are my first impressions of how they compare.

Damn Small Linux (DSL)

I've been using this one for a while on an old 400MHz machine with 64mb of RAM. Its only a 50mb distribution that is very full-featured, including most everything you would expect from a Desktop distro (wordprocessor, browser, music player, etc). You can also install any number of apps through the MyDSL Browser. The developers of this distribution are constantly improving it, releasing new beta versions almost every month.

The target audience seems to be older, slower computers. I thought, before trying SliTak, that the reason that a lot of the software on this distribution is dated is because it is less bloated, less resource intensive, and functions better on old hardware. There is probably some truth to this. For example, the reason this distrubution uses the 2.4 linux kernel and not the 2.6 kernel is because the 2.6 kernel drops support for certain legacy hardware that DSL would be perfect for.But I'm not so sure anymore about the bloat thing (and I wonder about the resource intensive thing). The reason for this is because I've seen the power of SliTak, which I'll turn to now.

SliTak

This new distribution weighs in at 1/2 the size of DSL - a mere 25mb! I tried the most recent cooking version, and it incorporates a LOT! I'm very impressed. It includes the newest software--including, for example, the 2.6 Linux kernel and Firefox 3 beta. Its got a very slick modern user interface that makes DSL look dated and clunky by comparison. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that this well integrated system is damn sexy! That said, there are a couple of things that could improve my experience:
  1. It needs a wordprocessor - it doesn't ship with one by default (I think Ted would be an excellent choice).
  2. The stable version lacks some important key features: like support for the Dvorak keymapping and the ability to easily swith between keymappings.
  3. The beta version is somewhat buggy (the Dvorak keymap is wrong).
  4. I'm not sure how the username/password thing is supposed to work on this distribution. Can I only be "hacker"? Can I set my own password? I'm somewhat confused, and this is important, because when I drop to the command line, I need to know these things to execute certain commands.
  5. Although it is better in the beta, still much of the documentation appears to only be in French.
Nonetheless, these minor shortcomings are fairly trivial compared to the amazing things already been accomplished by this tiny distribution. I'll keep a close eye on its development!

Technorati Tags: , ,

Comments

Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
9:34 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Base64 decode to file

The internet sometimes sucks. I spent about 20 minutes searching the internet for an easy way to decode a base64 file in linux. Shouldn't be that hard. In fact, there is a base64 command. But fuck me, I sure couldn't get it to work with the file I had (which was supposed to decode into a .jpg). There is tons of nonsense about the theory and some stupid unhelpful web applications, but no practical examples. That is, until I stumbled upon this little gem - which gave me exactly what I wanted. perl -MMIME::Base64 -ne 'print decode_base64($_)' < file.txt > out A one-liner in Perl (of course). The fact that this info was so easy, yet it was so hard to find pisses me off. I'm sure there are other ways to do this. In fact, if you know of other ways to do this, then please leave me a comment telling me how. I hate when good info gets buried under the load of crap clogging the internet tubes. Technorati Tags: linux , base64 , perl
Read more

Swiftboating from the Left - Paul Harris's "The Real McCain"

The teaser of Harris's article is this: "To his fans he's a lovable patriot with a maverick streak. But to his critics he's an anti-abortion Creationist who surrounds himself with religious extremists. Paul Harris uncovers the dark side of John McCain" I'm an Obama supporter, but merely from the teaser I already want to run to McCain's defense. An "anti-abortion Creationist"? Really?? Bullshit. This is like the Obama "Terrorist fist jab" teaser on Fox - its utterly stupid. And provably so from a not-to-long ago debate: The rest of the article is blindingly obvious in its propagandistic machinery. Briefly mention a few reasons someone might think he's not such a bad guy (make sure to put it in the subjunctive). Claim this is all a facade to "propel him to the Oval Office". Expose the "dark side" that "lies behind his public mask". Pull out any dirt you can and start slinging. Precisely this formula is
Read more